Discussion:
Hiding address
(too old to reply)
rusking
2003-10-05 22:42:10 UTC
Permalink
I thought I'd worked out a way to stop spammers reading my address on here
but they can still see it. How do I remove sender from details?
***@lineone.net
Peter Boulding
2003-10-06 12:10:15 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:42:10 +0100, "rusking"
Post by rusking
I thought I'd worked out a way to stop spammers reading my address on here
but they can still see it. How do I remove sender from details?
[Note: this is the wrong newsgroup for this query; it's intended
for people who create online help for Windows programs.]

AFAIK Outlook Express doesn't create a "Sender" header, so I
assume its addition is a policy imposed by your BBC news
administrator.

(Also AFAIK) spammers' address-garnering bots do not yet pick up
the contents of a "Sender" header, but until the Swen worm
started using it, people always thought that an un-munged
"Reply-To" address was safe, too.
--
Regards Peter Boulding
***@UNSPAMpboulding.co.uk (to e-mail, remove "UNSPAM")
Fractal gallery: http://www.pboulding.co.uk/
Fractal music: http://www.pjbmusic2.freeserve.co.uk/
rusking
2003-10-06 22:36:48 UTC
Permalink
Thanks for imfo Peter,
Russell
Post by Peter Boulding
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003 23:42:10 +0100, "rusking"
Post by rusking
I thought I'd worked out a way to stop spammers reading my address on here
but they can still see it. How do I remove sender from details?
[Note: this is the wrong newsgroup for this query; it's intended
for people who create online help for Windows programs.]
AFAIK Outlook Express doesn't create a "Sender" header, so I
assume its addition is a policy imposed by your BBC news
administrator.
(Also AFAIK) spammers' address-garnering bots do not yet pick up
the contents of a "Sender" header, but until the Swen worm
started using it, people always thought that an un-munged
"Reply-To" address was safe, too.
--
Regards Peter Boulding
Fractal gallery: http://www.pboulding.co.uk/
Fractal music: http://www.pjbmusic2.freeserve.co.uk/
Loading...